(This article was originally published at Error Statistics Philosophy » Statistics, and syndicated at StatsBlogs.)
- 3 years ago…
MONTHLY MEMORY LANE: 3 years ago: August 2012. I mark in red three posts that seem most apt for general background on key issues in this blog.[1] Posts that are part of a “unit” or a group of “U-Phils” count as one (there are 4 U-Phils on Wasserman this time). Monthly memory lanes began at the blog’s 3-year anniversary in Sept, 2014. We’re about to turn four.
August 2012
- (8/2) Stephen Senn: Fooling the Patient: an Unethical Use of Placebo? (Phil/Stat/Med)
- (8/5) A “Bayesian Bear” rejoinder practically writes itself…
- (8/6) Bad news bears: Bayesian rejoinder
- (8/8) U-PHIL: Aris Spanos on Larry Wasserman[2]
- (8/10) U-PHIL: Hennig and Gelman on Wasserman (2011)
- (8/11) E.S. Pearson Birthday
- (8/11) U-PHIL: Wasserman Replies to Spanos and Hennig
- (8/13) U-Phil: (concluding the deconstruction) Wasserman/Mayo
- (8/14) Good Scientist Badge of Approval?
- (8/16) E.S. Pearson’s Statistical Philosophy
- (8/18) A. Spanos: Egon Pearson’s Neglected Contributions to Statistics
- (8/20) Higgs Boson: Bayesian “Digest and Discussion”
- (8/22) Scalar or Technicolor? S. Weinberg, “Why the Higgs?”
- (8/25) “Did Higgs Physicists Miss an Opportunity by Not Consulting More With Statisticians?
- (8/27) Knowledge/evidence not captured by mathematical prob.
- (8/30) Frequentist Pursuit
- (8/31) Failing to Apply vs Violating the Likelihood Principle
[1] excluding those reblogged fairly recently.
[2] Larry Wasserman’s paper was “Low Assumptions, High dimensions” in our special RIMM volume.
Filed under: 3-year memory lane, Statistics
Please comment on the article here: Error Statistics Philosophy » Statistics
