Blog Archives

Oxford Gaol: Statistical Bogeymen

October 31, 2014
By
Oxford Gaol: Statistical Bogeymen

Memory Lane: 3 years ago. Oxford Jail (also called Oxford Castle) is an entirely fitting place to be on (and around) Halloween! Moreover, rooting around this rather lavish set of jail cells (what used to be a single cell is now a dressing room) is every bit as conducive to philosophical reflection as is exile on Elba! (It […]

Read more »

Oxford Gaol: Statistical Bogeymen

October 31, 2014
By
Oxford Gaol: Statistical Bogeymen

Memory Lane: 3 years ago. Oxford Jail (also called Oxford Castle) is an entirely fitting place to be on (and around) Halloween! Moreover, rooting around this rather lavish set of jail cells (what used to be a single cell is now a dressing room) is every bit as conducive to philosophical reflection as is exile on Elba! (It […]

Read more »

3 YEARS AGO: MONTHLY MEMORY LANE

October 25, 2014
By
3 YEARS AGO: MONTHLY MEMORY LANE

MONTHLY MEMORY LANE: 3 years ago: October 2011 (I mark in red 3 posts that seem most apt for general background on key issues in this blog*) (10/3) Part 2 Prionvac: The Will to Understand Power (10/4) Part 3 Prionvac: How the Reformers Should Have done Their Job (10/5) Formaldehyde Hearing: How to Tell the Truth With Statistically Insignificant Results (10/7) Blogging […]

Read more »

September 2014: Blog Contents

October 23, 2014
By
September 2014: Blog Contents

September 2014: Error Statistics Philosophy Blog Table of Contents  Compiled by Jean A. Miller (9/30) Letter from George (Barnard) (9/27) Should a “Fictionfactory” peepshow be barred from a festival on “Truth and Reality”? Diederik Stapel says no (rejected post) (9/23) G.A. Barnard: The Bayesian “catch-all” factor: probability vs likelihood (9/21) Statistical Theater of the Absurd: “Stat on a […]

Read more »

PhilStat/Law: Nathan Schachtman: Acknowledging Multiple Comparisons in Statistical Analysis: Courts Can and Must

October 19, 2014
By
PhilStat/Law: Nathan Schachtman: Acknowledging Multiple Comparisons in Statistical Analysis: Courts Can and Must

The following is from Nathan Schachtman’s legal blog, with various comments and added emphases (by me, in this color). He will try to reply to comments/queries. “Courts Can and Must Acknowledge Multiple Comparisons in Statistical Analyses” Nathan Schachtman, Esq., PC * October 14th, 2014 In excluding the proffered testimony of Dr. Anick Bérard, a Canadian perinatal […]

Read more »

Bayesian Confirmation Philosophy and the Tacking Paradox (iv)*

October 20, 2013
By
Bayesian Confirmation Philosophy and the Tacking Paradox (iv)*

*addition of note [2]. A long-running research program in philosophy is to seek a quantitative measure C(h,x) to capture intuitive ideas about “confirmation” and about “confirmational relevance”. The components of C(h,x) are allowed to be any statements, no reference to a probability model or to joint distributions are required. Then h is “confirmed” or supported […]

Read more »

Sir David Cox: a comment on the post, “Was Hosiasson pulling Jeffreys’ leg?”

October 12, 2013
By
Sir David Cox: a comment on the post, “Was Hosiasson pulling Jeffreys’ leg?”

David Cox sent me a letter relating to my post of Oct.5, 2013. He has his own theory as to who might have been doing the teasing! I’m posting it  here, with his permission:  Dear Deborah I was interested to see the correspondence about Jeffreys and the possible teasing by Neyman’s associate. It brought a […]

Read more »

Blog Contents: August 2013

September 27, 2013
By
Blog Contents: August 2013

August 2013 (8/1) Blogging (flogging?) the SLP: Response to Reply- Xi’an Robert (8/5) At the JSM: 2013 International Year of Statistics (8/6) What did Nate Silver just say? Blogging the JSM (8/9) 11th bullet, multiple choice question, and last thoughts on the JSM (8/11) E.S. Pearson: “Ideas came into my head as I sat on […]

Read more »

“When Bayesian Inference Shatters” Owhadi, Scovel, and Sullivan (guest post)

September 15, 2013
By
“When Bayesian Inference Shatters” Owhadi, Scovel, and Sullivan (guest post)

I’m extremely grateful to Drs. Owhadi, Scovel and Sullivan for replying to my request for “a plain Jane” explication of their interesting paper, “When Bayesian Inference Shatters”, and especially for permission to post it. If readers want to ponder the paper awhile and send me comments for guest posts or “U-PHILS*” (by OCT 15), let […]

Read more »

(Part 2) Peircean Induction and the Error-Correcting Thesis

September 11, 2013
By
(Part 2) Peircean Induction and the Error-Correcting Thesis

Continuation of “Peircean Induction and the Error-Correcting Thesis” Deborah G. Mayo Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, Volume 41, Number 2, 2005, pp. 299-319 Part 1 is here. There are two other points of confusion in critical discussions of the SCT, that we may note here: I. The […]

Read more »


Subscribe

Email:

  Subscribe