Posts Tagged ‘ Fisher ’

Deconstructing the Fisher-Neyman conflict wearing fiducial glasses (continued)

February 24, 2018
By
Deconstructing the Fisher-Neyman conflict wearing fiducial glasses (continued)

This continues my previous post: “Can’t take the fiducial out of Fisher…” in recognition of Fisher’s birthday, February 17. I supply a few more intriguing articles you may find enlightening to read and/or reread on a Saturday night Move up 20 years to the famous 1955/56 exchange between Fisher and Neyman. Fisher clearly connects Neyman’s adoption of […]

Read more »

Can’t Take the Fiducial Out of Fisher (if you want to understand the N-P performance philosophy) [i]

February 23, 2018
By
Can’t Take the Fiducial Out of Fisher (if you want to understand the N-P performance philosophy) [i]

Continuing with posts in recognition of R.A. Fisher’s birthday, I post one from a couple of years ago on a topic that had previously not been discussed on this blog: Fisher’s fiducial probability.  [Neyman and Pearson] “began an influential collaboration initially designed primarily, it would seem to clarify Fisher’s writing. This led to their theory […]

Read more »

R. A. Fisher: How an Outsider Revolutionized Statistics (Aris Spanos)

February 19, 2018
By
R. A. Fisher: How an Outsider Revolutionized Statistics (Aris Spanos)

In recognition of R.A. Fisher’s birthday on February 17…. ‘R. A. Fisher: How an Outsider Revolutionized Statistics’ by Aris Spanos Few statisticians will dispute that R. A. Fisher (February 17, 1890 – July 29, 1962) is the father of modern statistics; see Savage (1976), Rao (1992). Inspired by William Gosset’s (1908) paper on the Student’s […]

Read more »

Guest Blog: STEPHEN SENN: ‘Fisher’s alternative to the alternative’

February 18, 2018
By
Guest Blog: STEPHEN SENN: ‘Fisher’s alternative to the alternative’

As part of the week of recognizing R.A.Fisher (February 17, 1890 – July 29, 1962), I reblog a guest post by Stephen Senn from 2012/2017.  The comments from 2017 lead to a troubling issue that I will bring up in the comments today. ‘Fisher’s alternative to the alternative’ By: Stephen Senn [2012 marked] the 50th anniversary […]

Read more »

Happy Birthday R.A. Fisher: ‘Two New Properties of Mathematical Likelihood’

February 17, 2018
By
Happy Birthday R.A. Fisher: ‘Two New Properties of Mathematical Likelihood’

Today is R.A. Fisher’s birthday. I’ll post some Fisherian items this week in honor of it. This paper comes just before the conflicts with Neyman and Pearson erupted.  Fisher links his tests and sufficiency, to the Neyman and Pearson lemma in terms of power.  It’s as if we may see them as ending up in […]

Read more »

Guest Blog: STEPHEN SENN: ‘Fisher’s alternative to the alternative’

February 22, 2017
By
Guest Blog: STEPHEN SENN: ‘Fisher’s alternative to the alternative’

As part of the week of recognizing R.A.Fisher (February 17, 1890 – July 29, 1962), I reblog a guest post by Stephen Senn from 2012.  (I will comment in the comments.) ‘Fisher’s alternative to the alternative’ By: Stephen Senn [2012 marked] the 50th anniversary of RA Fisher’s death. It is a good excuse, I think, to […]

Read more »

Guest Blog: ARIS SPANOS: The Enduring Legacy of R. A. Fisher

February 19, 2017
By
Guest Blog: ARIS SPANOS: The Enduring Legacy of R. A. Fisher

By Aris Spanos One of R. A. Fisher’s (17 February 1890 — 29 July 1962) most re­markable, but least recognized, achievement was to initiate the recast­ing of statistical induction. Fisher (1922) pioneered modern frequentist statistics as a model-based approach to statistical induction anchored on the notion of a statistical model, formalized by: Mθ(x)={f(x;θ); θ∈Θ}; x∈Rn […]

Read more »

R.A. Fisher: ‘Two New Properties of Mathematical Likelihood’

February 17, 2017
By
R.A. Fisher: ‘Two New Properties of Mathematical Likelihood’

Today is R.A. Fisher’s birthday. I’ll post some different Fisherian items this week in honor of it. This paper comes just before the conflicts with Neyman and Pearson erupted.  Fisher links his tests and sufficiency, to the Neyman and Pearson lemma in terms of power.  It’s as if we may see them as ending up […]

Read more »

Deconstructing the Fisher-Neyman conflict wearing fiducial glasses (continued)

February 20, 2016
By
Deconstructing the Fisher-Neyman conflict wearing fiducial glasses (continued)

This continues my previous post: “Can’t take the fiducial out of Fisher…” in recognition of Fisher’s birthday, February 17. I supply a few more intriguing articles you may find enlightening to read and/or reread on a Saturday night Move up 20 years to the famous 1955/56 exchange between Fisher and Neyman. Fisher clearly connects Neyman’s adoption of […]

Read more »

Can’t Take the Fiducial Out of Fisher (if you want to understand the N-P performance philosophy) [i]

February 17, 2016
By
Can’t Take the Fiducial Out of Fisher (if you want to understand the N-P performance philosophy) [i]

In recognition of R.A. Fisher’s birthday today, I’ve decided to share some thoughts on a topic that has so far has been absent from this blog: Fisher’s fiducial probability. Happy Birthday Fisher. [Neyman and Pearson] “began an influential collaboration initially designed primarily, it would seem to clarify Fisher’s writing. This led to their theory of […]

Read more »


Subscribe

Email:

  Subscribe