Posts Tagged ‘ Decision Theory ’

Chris Rock (3) vs. Thomas Hobbes; Wood advances

March 26, 2015
By

In yesterday‘s contest, there’s no doubt in my mind that Levi-Strauss would give a better and more interesting talk than Wood, whose lecture would presumably feature non-sequiturs, solecisms, continuity violations, and the like. But the funniest comment was from Jonathan: Ed Wood on Forecasting: “We are all interested in the future for that is where […] The post Chris Rock (3) vs. Thomas Hobbes; Wood advances appeared first on Statistical…

Read more »

Claude Levi-Strauss (4) vs. Ed Wood (3); Cervantes wins

March 25, 2015
By

For yesterday we have a tough call, having to decide between two much-loved philosophical writers, as Jonathan put it in comments: Camus on ramdomness; how make a model when there is no signal — only noise. Cervantes on making the world fit the model through self-delusion. Two fascinating statistics lectures with the same underlying theme […] The post Claude Levi-Strauss (4) vs. Ed Wood (3); Cervantes wins appeared first on…

Read more »

Miguel de Cervantes (2) vs. Albert Camus (1); Twain wins

March 24, 2015
By

Yesterday‘s winner is Mark Twain because, as Anonymous demonstrated in the comments, Twain on Eddy is more interesting than Eddy on Eddy. Today’s third-round match pits an eternal classic vs. the coolest of the cool. P.S. As always, here&#...

Read more »

Round 3 begins! Mark Twain (4) vs. Mary Baker Eddy

March 23, 2015
By
Round 3 begins!  Mark Twain (4) vs. Mary Baker Eddy

After yesterday‘s John Waters victory, we’re now in the Round of 16: Thanks again to Paul Davidson for providing the bracket. Remaining are 4 authors, 3 comedians, 3 cult figures, 1 founder of religion, 2 French intellectuals, 2 philosophers, 1 religious leader, and 0 artists. Today’s lucha is a classic grudge match—Twain and Eddy have […] The post Round 3 begins! Mark Twain (4) vs. Mary Baker Eddy appeared first…

Read more »

Paul Meehl continues to be the boss

March 23, 2015
By

Lee Sechrest writes: Here is a remarkable paper, not well known, by Paul Meehl. My research group is about to undertake a fresh discussion of it, which we do about every five or ten years. The paper is now more than a quarter of a century old but it is, I think, dramatically pertinent to […] The post Paul Meehl continues to be the boss appeared first on Statistical Modeling,…

Read more »

On deck this week

March 23, 2015
By

Mon: Paul Meehl continues to be the boss Tues: Adiabatic as I wanna be: Or, how is a chess rating like classical economics? Wed: Define first, prove later Thurs: Another disgraced primatologist . . . this time featuring “sympathetic dentists” Fri: Imagining p The post On deck this week appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science.

Read more »

Judy Garland (4) vs. John Waters (1); Carlin advances

March 22, 2015
By
Judy Garland (4) vs. John Waters (1); Carlin advances

Not a lot of action on yesterday‘s post, so I don’t think the winner will advance any farther . . . But, in any case, I’ll call it for Carlin based on Jonathan’s amusing babble of postmodernist commentary. As for today: What can you say? A great pairing to close out the second round of […] The post Judy Garland (4) vs. John Waters (1); Carlin advances appeared first on…

Read more »

George Carlin (2) vs. Jacques Derrida; Updike advances

March 21, 2015
By

Yesterday‘s best comment comes from Zbicyclist, who wrote: My wife would prefer I not go to a talk by someone who wrote so extensively about adultery. But of course that would rule out both John Updike and Bertrand Russell. We could use “number of wives” as a tiebreaker, but instead I’ll go with Updike based […] The post George Carlin (2) vs. Jacques Derrida; Updike advances appeared first on Statistical…

Read more »

John Updike vs. Bertrand Russell; Nietzsche advances

March 20, 2015
By

In yesterday‘s bout, another founder of religion falls, thanks to this comment by Zbicyclist: Do we want an audience full of would-be Ubermensches, or an audience of the proletariat? Considering Columbia is an Ivy League school, I guess we have to go with the Ubermensches. And today’s contest features the eminently sane conservative vs. the […] The post John Updike vs. Bertrand Russell; Nietzsche advances appeared first on Statistical Modeling,…

Read more »

Karl Marx vs. Friedrich Nietzsche (4); Austen advances

March 19, 2015
By

For yesterday, I was strongly rooting for Popper. I read several of his books about thirty years ago and they had a huge effect on me (and on a lot of social scientists, I think). But the best comment was about Austen. Here’s Dalton with the comment: “A woman, especially if she has the misfortune […] The post Karl Marx vs. Friedrich Nietzsche (4); Austen advances appeared first on Statistical…

Read more »


Subscribe

Email:

  Subscribe