Posts Tagged ‘ cross validated ’

Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple

October 26, 2015
By
Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple

By some piece of luck, I came upon the book Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple, written by Allen B. Downey and published by Green Tea Press [which I could relate to No Starch Press, focussing on coffee!, which published Statistics Done Wrong that I reviewed a while ago] which usually publishes programming books with […]

Read more »

Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple

October 26, 2015
By
Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple

By some piece of luck, I came upon the book Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple, written by Allen B. Downey and published by Green Tea Press [which I could relate to No Starch Press, focussing on coffee!, which published Statistics Done Wrong that I reviewed a while ago] which usually publishes programming books with […]

Read more »

Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple

October 26, 2015
By
Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple

By some piece of luck, I came upon the book Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple, written by Allen B. Downey and published by Green Tea Press [which I could relate to No Starch Press, focussing on coffee!, which published Statistics Done Wrong that I reviewed a while ago] which usually publishes programming books with […]

Read more »

dynamic mixtures [at NBBC15]

June 17, 2015
By
dynamic mixtures [at NBBC15]

A funny coincidence: as I was sitting next to Arnoldo Frigessi at the NBBC15 conference, I came upon a new question on Cross Validated about a dynamic mixture model he had developed in 2002 with Olga Haug and Håvård Rue [whom I also saw last week in Valencià]. The dynamic mixture model they proposed replaces […]

Read more »

arbitrary distributions with set correlation

May 10, 2015
By
arbitrary distributions with set correlation

A question recently posted on X Validated by Antoni Parrelada: given two arbitrary cdfs F and G, how can we simulate a pair (X,Y) with marginals  F and G, and with set correlation ρ? The answer posted by Antoni Parrelada was to reproduce the Gaussian copula solution: produce (X’,Y’) as a Gaussian bivariate vector with […]

Read more »

the most patronizing start to an answer I have ever received

April 29, 2015
By
the most patronizing start to an answer I have ever received

Another occurrence [out of many!] of a question on X validated where the originator (primitivus petitor) was trying to get an explanation without the proper background. On either Bayesian statistics or simulation. The introductory sentence to the question was about “trying to understand how the choice of priors affects a Bayesian model estimated using MCMC” […]

Read more »

simulating correlated Binomials [another Bernoulli factory]

April 20, 2015
By
simulating correlated Binomials [another Bernoulli factory]

This early morning, just before going out for my daily run around The Parc, I checked X validated for new questions and came upon that one. Namely, how to simulate X a Bin(8,2/3) variate and Y a Bin(18,2/3) such that corr(X,Y)=0.5. (No reason or motivation provided for this constraint.) And I thought the following (presumably […]

Read more »

intuition beyond a Beta property

March 29, 2015
By
intuition beyond a Beta property

A self-study question on X validated exposed an interesting property of the Beta distribution: If x is B(n,m) and y is B(n+½,m) then √xy is B(2n,2m) While this can presumably be established by a mere change of variables, I could not carry the derivation till the end and used instead the moment generating function E[(XY)s/2] […]

Read more »

the density that did not exist…

January 26, 2015
By
the density that did not exist…

On Cross Validated, I had a rather extended discussion with a user about a probability density as I thought it could be decomposed in two manageable conditionals and simulated by Gibbs sampling. The first component led to a Gumbel like density wirh y being restricted to either (0,1) or (1,∞) depending on β. The density […]

Read more »

simulation by inverse cdf

January 13, 2015
By
simulation by inverse cdf

Another Cross Validated forum question that led me to an interesting (?) reconsideration of certitudes! When simulating from a normal distribution, is Box-Muller algorithm better or worse than using the inverse cdf transform? My first reaction was to state that Box-Muller was exact while the inverse cdf relied on the coding of the inverse cdf, like […]

Read more »


Subscribe

Email:

  Subscribe