Posts Tagged ‘ Sociology ’

Will transparency damage science?

May 19, 2016
By
Will transparency damage science?

Jonathan Sterne sent me this opinion piece by Stephan Lewandowsky and Dorothy Bishop, two psychology researchers who express concern that the movement for science and data transparency has been abused. It would be easy for me to dismiss them and take a hard-line pro-transparency position—and I do take a hard-line pro-transparency position—but, as they remind […] The post Will transparency damage science? appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and…

Read more »

Bias against women in academia

May 19, 2016
By
Bias against women in academia

I’m not the best one to write about this: to the extent that there’s bias in favor of men, I’ve been a beneficiary. Also I’m not familiar with the research on the topic. I know there are some statistical difficulties in setting up these causal questions, comparable to the difficulties arising in using “hedonic regression” […] The post Bias against women in academia appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference,…

Read more »

Birthday analysis—Friday the 13th update, and some model checking

May 18, 2016
By
Birthday analysis—Friday the 13th update, and some model checking

Carl Bialik and Andrew Flowers at fivethirtyeight.com (Nate Silver’s site) ran a story following up on our birthdays example—that time series decomposition of births by day, which is on the cover of the third edition of Bayesian Data Analysis using data from 1968-1988, and which then Aki redid using a new dataset from 2000-2014. Friday […] The post Birthday analysis—Friday the 13th update, and some model checking appeared first on…

Read more »

Peer review abuse flashback

May 15, 2016
By
Peer review abuse flashback

Our recent discussion of the problems with peer review reminded me of this amusing/horrifying story from a few years ago, when some researchers noticed a data coding error in a published paper Once it was noticed, the error was obvious: But the authors of the original paper had that never-back-down attitude. So instead of thanking […] The post Peer review abuse flashback appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and…

Read more »

Math on a plane!

May 8, 2016
By
Math on a plane!

Paul Alper pointed me to this news article about an economist who got BUSTED for doing algebra on the plane. This dude was profiled by the lady sitting next to him who got suspicious of his incomprehensible formulas. I feel that way about a lot of econ research too, so I can see where she […] The post Math on a plane! appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and…

Read more »

The Puzzle of Paul Meehl: An intellectual history of research criticism in psychology

May 6, 2016
By
The Puzzle of Paul Meehl:  An intellectual history of research criticism in psychology

There’s nothing wrong with Meehl. He’s great. The puzzle of Paul Meehl is that everything we’re saying now, all this stuff about the problems with Psychological Science and PPNAS and Ted talks and all that, Paul Meehl was saying 50 years ago. And it was no secret. So how is it that all this was […] The post The Puzzle of Paul Meehl: An intellectual history of research criticism in…

Read more »

PPNAS: How does it happen? And happen? And happen? And happen?

May 4, 2016
By
PPNAS:  How does it happen?  And happen?  And happen?  And happen?

In the comment thread to today’s post on journalists who take PPNAS papers at face value, Mark asked, in response to various flaws pointed out in one of these papers: How can the authors (and the reviewers and the editor) not be aware of something so elementary? My reply: Regarding the authors, see here. Statistics […] The post PPNAS: How does it happen? And happen? And happen? And happen? appeared…

Read more »

No Retractions, Only Corrections: A manifesto.

May 1, 2016
By

Under the heading, “Why that Evolution paper should never have been retracted: A reviewer speaks out,” biologist Ben Ashby writes: The problems of post-publication peer review have already been highlighted elsewhere, and it certainly isn’t rare for a paper to be retracted due to an honest mistake (although most retractions are due to misconduct). Moreover, […] The post No Retractions, Only Corrections: A manifesto. appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal…

Read more »

I owe it all to my Neanderthal genes

April 25, 2016
By
I owe it all to my Neanderthal genes

Yesterday I posted a methods-focused item at the Monkey Cage, a follow-up of a post from a couple years ago arguing against some dramatic claims by economists Ashraf and Galor regarding the wealth of nations. No big deal, just some standard-issue skepticism. But for some reason this one caught fire—maybe somebody important linked to it, […] The post I owe it all to my Neanderthal genes appeared first on Statistical…

Read more »

Put your own questions on the General Social Survey!

April 15, 2016
By

Tom Smith of the National Opinion Research Center writes: The General Social Survey plans to include some items or short topical modules designed by users in its 2018 survey, and invites users to submit proposals recommending such items or modules. Proposals submitted in response to this call will be included based on assessments of their […] The post Put your own questions on the General Social Survey! appeared first on…

Read more »


Subscribe

Email:

  Subscribe