Posts Tagged ‘ Miscellaneous Statistics ’

Discreteland and Continuousland

July 6, 2015
By

Roy Mendelssohn points me to this paper by Jianqing Fan, Qi-Man Shao, and Wen-Xin Zhou, “Are Discoveries Spurious? Distributions of Maximum Spurious Correlations and Their Applications.” I never know what to think about these things because I don’t work in a discrete world in which there are zero effects (see our earlier discussion of the […] The post Discreteland and Continuousland appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social…

Read more »

“Menstrual Cycle Phase Does Not Predict Political Conservatism”

July 5, 2015
By
“Menstrual Cycle Phase Does Not Predict Political Conservatism”

Someone pointed me to this article by Isabel Scott and Nicholas Pound: Recent authors have reported a relationship between women’s fertility status, as indexed by menstrual cycle phase, and conservatism in moral, social and political values. We conducted a survey to test for the existence of a relationship between menstrual cycle day and conservatism. 2213 […] The post “Menstrual Cycle Phase Does Not Predict Political Conservatism” appeared first on Statistical…

Read more »

God is in every leaf of every probability puzzle

June 29, 2015
By

Radford shared with us this probability puzzle of his from 1999: A couple you’ve just met invite you over to dinner, saying “come by around 5pm, and we can talk for a while before our three kids come home from school at 6pm”. You arrive at the appointed time, and are invited into the house. […] The post God is in every leaf of every probability puzzle appeared first on…

Read more »

What’s So Fun About Fake Data?

June 28, 2015
By

Our first Daily Beast column is here. The post What’s So Fun About Fake Data? appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science.

Read more »

Our new column in the Daily Beast

June 25, 2015
By

Kaiser Fung and I have a new weekly column for the Daily Beast. After much deliberation, we gave it the title Statbusters (the runner-up choice was Dirty Data; my personal preference was Statboyz in the Hood, but, hey, who ever listens to me on anything?). The column will appear every Saturday, and Kaiser and I […] The post Our new column in the Daily Beast appeared first on Statistical Modeling,…

Read more »

“When more data steer us wrong: replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions”

June 21, 2015
By

Evan Heit sent in this article with Caren Rotello and Chad Dubé: There is a replication crisis in science, to which psychological research has not been immune: Many effects have proven uncomfortably difficult to reproduce. Although the reliability of data is a serious concern, we argue that there is a deeper and more insidious problem […] The post “When more data steer us wrong: replications with the wrong dependent measure…

Read more »

Statistics Be

June 20, 2015
By
Statistics Be

This modern statistics got me confused, To tell you friends I’m quite unenthused. This modern statistics got me confused, To tell you friends I’m quite unenthused. I like Pee Wee Fisher or the great Jerzy But can’t make head nor tail of this Robby Tibsh’rani With his Oop-pop-a-da Be-a-ba-du-la-be-plee Ple-oobly-oobly-oobly-oobie Chum-cheeree-a-bah Oop-pop-a-dee-de-doom ah-ah! Robby Tibsh’rani […] The post Statistics Be appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science.

Read more »

In which a complete stranger offers me a bet

June 19, 2015
By
In which a complete stranger offers me a bet

Piotr Mitros wrote to Deb and me: I read, with pleasure, your article about the impossibility of biasing a coin. I’m curious as to whether researchers believe what they write. Would you be willing to place some form of iterated bet? For example: I provide a two-sided coin and a table. The table looks like […] The post In which a complete stranger offers me a bet appeared first on…

Read more »

You can crush us, you can bruise us, yes, even shoot us, but oh—not a pie chart!

June 18, 2015
By
You can crush us, you can bruise us, yes, even shoot us, but oh—not a pie chart!

Byron Gajewski pointed me to this several-years-old article from the Onion, which begins: According to a groundbreaking new study published Monday in The Journal Of The American Statistical Association, somewhere on the planet someone is totally doing it at this very moment. “Of the 6.7 billion inhabitants of Earth, approximately 3.5 billion have reached sexual […] The post You can crush us, you can bruise us, yes, even shoot us,…

Read more »

The language of insignificance

June 13, 2015
By

Jonathan Falk points me to an amusing post by Matthew Hankins giving synonyms for “not statistically significant.” Hankins writes: The following list is culled from peer-reviewed journal articles in which (a) the authors set themselves the threshold of 0.05 for significance, (b) failed to achieve that threshold value for p and (c) described it in […] The post The language of insignificance appeared first on Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and…

Read more »


Subscribe

Email:

  Subscribe