Jeff Lax writes:
I’m probably not the only one telling you about this Science story, but just in case.
The link points to a new research article reporting a failed replication of a study from 2008. The journal that published that now-questionable result refuses to consider publishing the replication attempt.
I agree it’s a problem but it doesn’t surprise me. It’s pretty random what these tabloids publish, as they get so many submissions. Sure, they couldn’t publish this particular paper, but maybe there was something more exciting submitted to Science that week, maybe a new manuscript by Michael Lacour?