Mike Hamburg designed an elliptic curve he calls Ed448-Goldilocks. The prefix Ed refers to the fact that it’s an Edwards curve. The number 448 refers to the fact that the curve is over a prime field where the prime p has size 448 bits. But why Goldilocks?
Golden primes and Goldilocks
The prime in this case is
p = 2448 – 2224 – 1,
I call this the “Goldilocks” prime because its form defines the golden ratio φ = 2224.
That sentence puzzled me. What does this have to do with the golden ratio? I don’t think there is a direct connection to the golden ratio (1 + √5)/2, unless I’m missing something. He calls p a golden ratio prime, by which I take it he means a prime of the form
q2n – qn – 1
where the analogy to the golden ratio is that the ratio of the first term to the second is the same as the ratio of the second to the third. In that case, I think “geometric prime” might have been a better name, because the terms are in a geometric progression.
Another justification for the “Goldilocks” term might be the allusion to the nursery tale: the middle term 2224 is “just right.” Hamburg says
Because 224 = 32*7 = 28*8 = 56*4, this prime supports fast arithmetic in radix 228 or 232 (on 32-bit machines) or 256 (on 64-bit machines). With 16, 28-bit limbs it works well on vector units such as NEON. Furthermore, radix-264 implementations are possible with greater efficiency than most of the NIST primes.
The title of this post is “Goldilocks and the three multiplications.” Where do the three multiplications come in? It’s an allusion to an algorithm for multi-precision multiplication that lets you get by with three multiplications where the most direct approach would require four. The algorithm is called Karatsuba multiplication .
Hamburg says “The main advantage of a golden-ratio prime is fast Karatsuba multiplication” and that if we set φ = 2224 then
Note that the first line on the right side involves four multiplications, but the bottom line involves three. Since the variables represent 224-bit numbers, removing a multiplication at the expense of an extra addition and subtraction is a net savings .
The most important line of the calculation above, and the only one that isn’t routine, is the second. That’s where the special form of p comes in. When you eliminate common terms from both sides, the calculation boils down to showing that
which is obviously true since p = φ² – φ – 1.
Edwards curves only have one free parameter d (besides the choice of field) since they have the form
x² + y² = 1 + d x² y².
Hamburg chose d = -39081 for reasons explained in the paper.
Most elliptic curves used in ECC currently work over prime fields of order 256 bits, providing 128 bits of security. The motivation for developed Ed448 was much the same as for developing P-384. Both work over larger fields and so provide more bits of security, 224 and 192 bits respectively.
Unlike P-384, Ed448 is a safe curve, meaning that it lends itself to a secure practical implementation.
 Here we’ve just applied the Karatsuba algorithm one time. You could apply it recursively to multiply two n-bit numbers in O(nk) time, where k = log2 3 ≈ 1.86. This algorithm, discovered in 1960, was the first multiplication algorithm faster than O(n²).
 Addition and subtraction are O(n) operations. And what about multiplication? That’s not an easy question. It’s no worse than O(n1.68) by virtue of the Karatsuba algorithm. In fact, it’s O(n log n), but only for impractically large numbers. See the discussion here. But in any case, multiplication is slower than addition for multiprecision numbers.