The fractal nature of scientific revolutions

February 6, 2013

(This article was originally published at Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science, and syndicated at StatsBlogs.)

Phil Earnhardt writes:

I stumbled across your blog entry after googling on those terms.

If I could comment on the closed entry [We had to shut off comments on old blog entries for reasons of spam --- ed.], I’d note: scientific revolutions are fractal; they’re also chaotic in their dynamics. Predictability when a particular scientific revolution will take hold—or be rejected—is problematic. I find myself wishing that Chaos Theory had been established when Kuhn wrote his essay.

Please comment on the article here: Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science